Week 5 - Piltdown Hoax Blog Post
The Piltdown hoax, being one of the
most infamous in the history of evolution theory research, began when amateur
archeologist Charles Dawson “found” remains of human skull in his backyard in
Piltdown, England in 1912. He claimed to have found a piece of an ape looking
jaw with human like teeth in it. He invited fellow archeologist Arthur Woodward
and paleontologist Pierre Teilhard
to help him search the rest of the site for evidence. The discovery of the Jaw
bone first led the scientific community to believe that they had found the
earliest ancestor to human species. This news brought joy to England since no primitive
human fossil has ever been found on the island. Considering the age at which scientist
estimated the bone to be, England would have had evidence of having the most
primitive of human ancestry. Dawson was invited to be honored at the Royal Society
which was his dream come true.
However,
fame only lasted so long until the hoax was uncovered with the help of advanced
scientific tools, processes and methodologies. Before the hoax was uncovered,
scientists had their doubts, but no one wanted to rain on the pride of this
English discovery. Even more, Woodward’s prestige in the scientific community for
his archeological research was clearly established which lessened suspicion.
Therefore, when it was discovered that the fossils were fabricated, it shocked
the world.
One can’t
help but wonder, how could this have happened? Without the access to advanced
research methods, human faults played a significant role in the making of the
hoax. While it is easy to place all the blame on Dawson’s pride and aspiration for
the entire outcome of the hoax, members of the English scientific community
also played a significant role. Their pride in ancestry and jealousy of mainland
Europe fossil discoveries clouded their judgement in evaluating the accuracy
and validity of the discovery.
The main
aspect of the scientific process that helped uncover the hoax was retesting the
hypothesis by analyzing the evidence and doing additional research outside of English
influence. With the help of the microscope, process of dating using fluorine
content calculation and additional outside research, the hoax was finally
proven to be fake 40 years later. Researchers found microscopic evidence of
artificial erosion of teeth which indicated that the “human” teeth were not
human after all. Fluorine content calculations helped identify roughly that the
age of the fossils were no more than 100,000 years old, as opposed to first
evaluations that claimed the bones were millions of years old. International
discoveries in Africa and Asia of younger fossils that looked less human which
confused scientist about the history of the Piltdown fossils and their connection
to human ancestry. Along with the discovery of superficial staining and the Jaw
bone belonging to an 100 year old female Orangutan, the Piltdown man was
finally deemed a hoax.
It was
learned after this event that the human factor can be a huge distraction in the
scientific realm. However, although it may prevent any hoax like Piltdown to
ever happen again, the human factor cannot be removed from science. After all,
it is human drive and aspirations, like that of Dawson’s, that leads us to legitimate
scientific discoveries. Science wouldn’t seem so fun if it weren’t for the
passion and drive exhibited by those involved. Computers will always work
alongside us but they won’t be able to program drive, motivation, and intuition
in order to pursue scientific discovery themselves.
There are
several lessons to be learned from the Piltdown Hoax. One, never trust blindly,
even if it means challenging possible greatness and upsetting others in
authority. Two, it is okay to be wrong. All of human advances aren’t made through
perfection and being wrong doesn’t mean you cannot be a great scientist one
day. Three, put pride aside for the sake of science. Pride, as we have seen in
this example, was the main catalyst in the snowball effect of the Piltdown
Hoax. It all started with Dawson’s pride and wish to be apart of the Royal Society.
Next thing, the entirety of England refused to explore the possibility that the
discovery is not what it seems. Finally, the hoax ended up distracting good
scientific work for 40 years. Objectivity should be the number one guide when conducting
scientific research.
Hi Julissa,
ReplyDeleteVery nice blog post. I was drawn in by the explicit details you added to make it a personal blog post. My most favorite part is your life lesson intakes on the embarrassing event of Dawsons hoax. I to agree that his pride got in the way of him becoming something better than a liar. His disparity blinded him from being ethical and true to himself. This assignment went beyond knowing what the biggest hoax in evolution discovery was, it give us insight to doing better, not being so naive, and always being honest.
In general, very good synopsis with good detail. Well told.
ReplyDeleteOnly the issue of "significance" needs to be clarified. Yes, this was significant because it was the first hominid found on English soil, but there was also *scientific* significance. Had Piltdown been valid, it would have helped us better understand *how* humans (not *if*) evolved from that common ancestor with non-human apes. Piltdown was characterized by large cranium combined with other more primitive, non-human traits, suggesting that the larger brains evolved relatively early in hominid evolutionary process. We now know this to be incorrect, that bipedalism evolved much earlier with larger brains evolving later, but Piltdown suggested that the "larger brains" theory, supported by Arthur Keith (one of the Piltdown scientists) was accurate.
Excellent discussion on the possible faults here, on both sides. I actually suggest that the willingness of the scientific community to accept this find so readily did more damage to science than the faked fossil ever did.
Great thorough discussion on the process and positive aspects of science that led to uncovering the hoax.
"After all, it is human drive and aspirations, like that of Dawson’s, that leads us to legitimate scientific discoveries."
Agreed, but we also rely on human curiosity, ingenuity and intuition to ask the questions in the first place and create ways of answering them.
Good life lesson.